“Agree to disagree” is white guy speak for “I understand you have an opinion but unfortunately, me.”
No it’s human being speak for “We have differing opinions and I can see that neither of us are going to persuade the other to change theirs so we shouldn’t continue this argument because it’s going nowhere” jesus you’re all fucking children
I can stomach bro-type boys who actually are quite sweet and loveable beneath their bro exterior significantly more than like, guys who study philosophy and write “poetry” but beneath it all actually have the skewed moral compass and heedless self absorption of your common or garden bro.
Can we stop this whole rudely replying to curious anons who have genuine questions?? Like who raised yall to be this nasty?? In the time it took you to type “I’m not fucking Google look it up” U could have answered the question like shit I am exhausted by all of this nastiness
my favourite kind of bruce ;___; being gentle and kind with lil kids
A Batman who does not show the utmost kindness and gentleness with children, especially those who have been hurt, abused, or abandoned, is no Batman at all.
Writing Batman 101^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^x100.
< Would like Batman to be written like this more often please and thank you <3
So, like, its totally cool if folks don’t see a romantic implication between Pearl and Rose from “Rose’s Scabbard” and if they think its some other kind of relationship. It’s totally their right to see it any sort of way. But I just find some of the arguments against it weird ‘cause I keep seeing stuff like people saying it obviously isn’t romantic because its clearly a “knight devoted to their Lady” sort of thing
and its weird to me because there’s absolutely no reason why it couldn’t be both? Like, there’re not mutually exclusive situations and in fact a knight who is devoted to serving the crown or what have you who also falls in love with the person they’re devoted too is a pretty common plot.
I’m not saying anyone has to see it this way, I’m just perplexed by some of the phrasing of posts that are like “it can’t be that because its this“ when there’s no reason it can’t be both. So it doesn’t really ‘disprove’ anything.
