HOT LINKS
store
click here!

i sell prints, bookmarks, charms and more at my store!



  1. Someone: *is late*
  2. Me: Were we supposed to meet at this time? Is this really the place we were going to meet up? Is it actually Thursday today? Were we even meeting at Thursday? Do I actually know this person? Do they really exist? Do I exist?



Feb 20.2017 | 338417notes -
posted by:mineapple - via & src

asspostate:

miss me with that ‘weapon accuracy’ shit. im shooting everything. im laying down cover fire. im shooting the walls. im shooting my teammates. im shooting myself. my accuracy is 100% yall just dont know what im aiming at




Feb 20.2017 | 347876notes -
posted by:mineapple - via & src

we’re settling this once and for all

spinachlicker:

reblog and tag your opinion on:

1. Candy corn
2. Ketchup
3. Coleslaw
4. Pineapple Pizza
5. Blue raspberry
6. Root Beer




Feb 20.2017 | 42634notes -
posted by:mineapple - via

cindersart:

damn okay shiro you could’ve just set the training gladiator on him, not crushed his confidence ://




Feb 20.2017 | 30398notes -
posted by:mineapple - via & src

hey tumblr can u stop throwing colourful rectangles at my face everytime i refresh k thanks




Feb 20.2017 -
posted by:mineapple

Drawing porn of child characters from comics or cartoons is ILLEGAL in the United States

lemonbubble:

thefloweryfanclub:

18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children                                                                 

(a)In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—                    

(1)                        

  • (A)    depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
  • (B)    is obscene; or                                                                

(2)                     

  •   (A)    depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and 
  •    (B)    lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;  or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.                                

(b)Additional Offenses.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly possesses a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—                    

(1)                 

  •      (A)        depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and                      
  • (B)      is obscene; or                                                                

(2)                       

  • (A)   depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and                                                
  • (B)   lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value; or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(2), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.                                

©Nonrequired Element of Offense.  It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist. Source

Here are some recent cases and convictions.

image
image

Most recent conviction seems to be May 2016. That’s this month.

When abusive adults in fandoms prey on the children in them, try to spread that it’s okay to draw child porn of the child characters, to sexualize the child characters, they are breaking the law and encouraging minors to break the law. The law doesn’t care if you use it as a “coping mechanism” (even forgetting that abused people can become abusers themselves). This is illegal and it can get you imprisoned.

Please boost this. Not enough people know the law exists and big-name artists routinely bully people, survivors, minors into believing that spreading child porn in their fandoms is okay and to do it themselves. It’s not, and it can get rebloggers arrested for possessing and spreading obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children.                 

For international artists: whatever website you’re using has to follow the laws of the country it’s based in, and that means you have to work within those laws too.

At the very least, I know this is illegal in New Zealand too. Also, look at this quote I found while I was researching to make sure those laws applied to drawn images too (they do): “regardless of the nature of the image it is still child pornography and should never be minimised.”

Look at that, “regardless of the nature of the image”. Its just fanart? They’re fictional? It’s only a drawing? regardless of the nature of the image it is still child pornography motherfucker




Feb 20.2017 | 43970notes -
posted by:mineapple - via & src

cinnamonrollbucky:

elphabaforpresidentofgallifrey:

squeeful:

rh0dey:

Fans: We need  more mentally ill characters!!

Tony Stark: *is mentally ill*

Fans: What the fuck

Fans: No, not like that. We meant in pretty, non-threatening, non-symptom-showing ways.

the most realistic part of these movies is tony stark being clearly mentally ill and everyone ignoring and blaming him

Ain’t that the fucking truth.




Feb 20.2017 | 63138notes -
posted by:mineapple - via

autisticgaara:

I made icons lmao @klanced @alien–chan ;)

bonus:

image



Feb 20.2017 | 2345notes -
posted by:mineapple - via & src

waltdisneyconfessionsrage:

helioscentrifuge:

intersectionalfeminism:

sailinginthetea:

there-was-a-girl:

manhatingmermaid:

Audrey says “fuck your gender roles”

This movie is super underrated.

Audrey is so underrated. How can you not love her?

I have a love-hate relationship with this movie.
On one hand it’s got awesome PoC characters who defy racial and gender stereotypes. It also discusses colonialism and how people tend to destroy indigenous cultures to obtain land and resources (which is why the crew ultimately decided a to pretend they never found Atlantis because they don’t want anyone else to try and destroy the culture).
But on the other hand, the whole plot is that Atlantis needs a white, cishet man to save it from extinction and for some reason he understand their culture and language better than they do.

hEY FUCK YOU OKAY
MILO WAS THE ANTITHESIS OF WHITE SAVIOR
HE WAS A NERDY USELESS LITTLE SHIT WHO WAS COWARDLY UNTIL OTHERS FORCED HIM TO ACT
HIS ONLY STRENGTHS WERE HIS MIND AND HIS ETHICS
HE WAS THE PERFECT DUDE FOR THE JOB AND THE REASON HE KNEW BETTER WAS BECAUSE HE RIGOROUSLY STUDIED TEXTS THAT HAD BEEN LOST OR DESTROYED IN ATLANTIS BECAUSE KIDA’S FATHER INTENTIONALLY LET HIS KINGDOM LAPSE INTO DECAY AND OBSCURITY

DO NOT PULL THAT WHITE SAVIOUR BULLSHIT BECAUSE MILO WAS A DAMN GOOD DUDE

I’ve been trying to tell people this for years. Also, what differentiates Milo’s experience from the white savior complex is his expectation and his attitude. When looking for Atlantis, the last thing Milo expects to find are people. He says the most they thought that they would find are carvings and pottery. And he would have been happy with just that.

And even when he finds the Atlanteans, he treats the culture and people with the utmost respect (peek the scene where the crew has their audience with the king). He never tries to interfere in the people’s way of life nor change them. He’s merely an observer fascinated with the culture/people and just wants to know more about them.

In most movies, the white savior comes into the situation with an attitude of superiority and only through his interactions with the native people (and a lot of times a beautiful native woman) is he humbled and then eventually brought in as an honorary member of the people. Milo never asks for thanks or wants to make a name for himself. He does what he does because he loves it and it’s a way to keep his grandfather’s legacy alive.

Yeah. Milo was a damn good dude.




Feb 20.2017 | 563546notes -
posted by:mineapple - via & src

‘Well look at you! You are as smart as all get out!! Either you were born in the South or you’re a life-long transplant, but either way – you KNOW the South. You probably drink sweet tea on a regular basis, and say “‘y'all” frequently! Congrats on a perfect score! ‘

wrong on all points




Feb 20.2017 -
posted by:mineapple

setheverman:

setheverman:

i’m getting messages like “i’m sorry about what happened in sweden last night” and i’m sitting here like “???? what happened????”

turns out trump had a speech where he talked about terrorism and said “You look at what’s happening last night in Sweden… Sweden!” but nothing actually happened here and our government is now trying to figure out what he was talking about ????? ? ? ????? ? ?????????????????

aaahh yeah sorry, turns out he was talking about Alternative Sweden where no one drives Volvo or listens to ABBA, and IKEA assembles the furniture for you




Feb 20.2017 | 169128notes -
posted by:mineapple - via & src

Quiz: Only 1 in 50 People Can Pass This Southern Slang Test. Can You? - Women.com

sauvamente:

note-a-bear:

princessnijireiki:

bye I got 100%

Lmao, the ancestors guided my choices, cause my Yankee ass come up 100%

100% of course




Feb 20.2017 | 5214notes -
posted by:mineapple - via & src

ithelpstodream:

Meanwhile white men caught preparing terrorist attacks are not charged under terrorism laws.




Feb 20.2017 | 36826notes -
posted by:mineapple - via & src

mineapple:

im just going to happily skip to the part where the gang is all back together in my mind and make some naptron~

click for bigger size!

available on society6 here!




Feb 20.2017 | 492notes -
posted by:mineapple - via
reblog    

lord-kitschener:

exstntl:

no one is ever too busy for you. that’s a lie. you make time for what you want

Disagree. People can still genuinely care about you, like you, and want to be with you, but everyone also has their own lives, struggles, and obligations. It’s extremely unfair and unreasonable to make a loyalty test out of whether or not they drop everything for you whenever you snap your fingers.

Of course it is important to find people who support you when you need it, would try their best to help in an emergency, and enjoys your company, but nobody is capable of being your 24/7 emotional emergency responder. That doesn’t mean they don’t care or don’t want to see you; and remember, part of a good friendship/relationship is that you support and encourage them in their own lives (which includes giving people space to pursue their goals), just as much as they support and encourage you in yours.




Feb 20.2017 | 132333notes -
posted by:mineapple - via






© EVILQUEENED